Home
  • Like Us On Facebook
    • Like us on Facebook

  • +1 Us on Google
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Search
Hypable

Bourne is back, sort of, in The Bourne Legacy, an expansion on the world of the original Bourne trilogy featuring a new central character, Aaron Cross (played by Jeremy Renner). In the world of Jason Bourne, this installment may not be completely necessary, but as a sharp, taut actioner it delivers on the type of visceral experience we’ve come to expect from the Bourne franchise.

Tony Gilroy, screenwriter of the first three Bourne films and director of the superb Michael Clayton, is back this time as writer and director, offering the steady hand at attempting to bridge the gap between this installment and the previous three. With no Matt Damon on board, it’s difficult to build a connection between Aaron Cross and Bourne, as Gilroy certainly gives it his best shot. I can’t really say it adds anything to the previous films, let alone this one, as if anything The Bourne Legacy feels constrained by the connection, as the world seems fairly separate, regardless of the fact the events in this film coincide with those of the previous trilogy.

Aaron Cross is an agent for Operation Outcome – a sort of sister program to Treadstone – whose life is threatened as the CIA attempts to clean up its programs after the catastrophe facing them due to the actions of Jason Bourne and Pamela Landy seen in The Bourne Ultimatum. The first third or so of the film is spent building up Cross as both a deadly operative – shown through scenes of “training” deep in the Alaskan wilderness – as well as illustrating the dire situation facing Cross and the other Outcome operatives. It’s a slow going for about forty minutes or so, but a necessary one.

Photo: Universal Pictures

When a seemingly random and horrific attack on an Outcome scientific lab, where operatives of the program received mysterious and advanced “chems” and medicine, leaves a lone survivor in the form of Dr. Marta Shearling (Rachel Weisz), it becomes clear her life is in danger, as she goes on the run with Cross in a mad dash for survival. This rather lengthy build-up leads to an overly long running time and opening act, although once it’s out of the way there’s only smooth (and exhilarating) sailing.

Jeremy Renner and Rachel Weisz are convincing as the two leads and own the screen in both the high paced action and slower scenes. It’s a form of chemistry and relationship that we don’t typically see in an action film such as this, but it works fantastically. Among those chasing Cross and Shearling at the CIA are returning faces such as Dr. Albert Hirsch (Albert Finney) and Ezra Kramer (Scott Glenn), as well as newcomer and chief antagonist Eric Byer (Edward Norton), who is portrayed terrifically, not as an inherently evil person but simply as a man in a tough position of power.

Familar faces such as Joan Allen as Pamela Landy and David Strathairn as Noah Vosen are shown intermittently, but the majority of the attention is placed on Cross and Shearling as they are chased throughout the world by Byer and the desperate CIA, forever the antagonistic, evil government agency. The action is perhaps less relenting in The Bourne Legacy than in previous installments, but when Gilroy opens up the throttle, it is as exhilarating and inventive as any action we’ve seen from the franchise.

Photo: Universal Pictures

Chief among these moments is a lengthy pursuit through the streets of Manila that is unrivaled in terms of action filmmaking we’ve seen this year. Decidedly less frantic and shaky than the camera employed by Paul Greengrass in The Bourne Ultimatum, there is nevertheless the familiar style in which the franchise portrays action seen here. Manila is the perfect playground for such a scene, crowded, foreign and frantic. The landscape here is a perfect one, as Gilroy leaves no stone unturned in a scene so captivating and visceral it alone is enough to whet the appetite of any Bourne fan.

The Bourne Legacy is a smart, efficient and exhilarating actioner with a solid duo in Renner and Weisz, however the connection between this and the other films in the franchise does more harm than good. Outside of the scope of Jason Bourne we have a solid, international thriller, which is lessened by the film’s insistence on buliding a larger picture of the Jason Bourne tale, when really it is quite unnecessary here. That aside, Tony Gilroy has offered up a satisfying actioner in the same vein as the previous Bourne films that should appease both fans and non-fans alike.

Grade: B

Rated: PG-13 (for violence and intense action sequences)

The Bourne Legacy opens in theaters on August 10, 2012.

  • Alexbee1989

    You gave it a B? Saw it with family and it was a total Fail for us.

    • Liderc

      Agreed, it was poorly written. I would peg it at maybe a C-. Renner, who I thought would be perfect for this role, just didn’t impress. But I just think it was too much going back and forth between bourne and cross to ever let you care about the characters.

      • SeanV22

        True, it wasn’t on the same level as the previous three, but it was by no means a fail. It was thrilling, suspenseful, and action-packed. After The Hurt Locker, Ghost Protocol, and The Bourne Legacy, Jeremy Renner is fast becoming one of my new favorite actors. He and Rachel Weisz (Who looks amazing, btw) had great chemistry. My only complaint was the lack of connection between Cross and Bourne. The reason why they were going back and forth between the two was to show how the events in The Bourne Ultimatum coincided with this movie. I also wanted a cameo from Matt Damon. Here’s hoping he’s in the next one (if there is a next one).

        • Liderc

          I really wasn’t impressed with Renner, which surprised me because I’ve really liked him recently. He seemed odd at the beginning. Like with Bourne he was always so serious, then we get Cross who is like laughing about what they are, what they’re doing ect… Just didn’t feel right. And the ending was like uhhh…that’s it? 

  • Team Haymitch

    I saw the movie at midnight and I was more entertained with this one than the previous films, IMHO. I thought it was clever and imaginative, but lacked the overall connection to Bourne – I honestly still don’t get it – it could’ve been better/more creative. But I really liked the super soldier idea for some reason… but could’ve been it’s own movie and I felt like it would be more successful, you know? The movie was also anticlimactic and I didn’t really like the forced romance between them. 

    However, I felt for both of the main characters, especially Marta. I felt the performances were strong from all of the actors and hope to see more from them along with Damon in the future. Maybe even Julia Stiles? Even though I’m a huge fan of Renner, I didn’t really have high expectations going into the film. It’s a risky movie to begin with. So, I guess I wasn’t as disappointed as most of you seem to be… It was a decent movie and it has made enough money at the opening weekend box office to get a sequel… I hope. I agree with your rating of a B and with Rotten Tomatoes at a 53%.Conclusion: Great cast and performances by the actors, but the overall movie was just okay. I was entertained, but not blown away. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Sofia-Thomas/100001117166893 Sofia Thomas

    I really liked this movie. It was entertaining, and suspenseful, and Jeremy Renner was great. I really liked him in this role. So, fingers crossed there’s a sequel!

Hypable encourages the community to use our Comments feature to hold thoughtful, polite, and critical discussions. We do NOT tolerate inappropriate, rude, or downright mean discussion towards the news story's subject matter or towards other Hypable users. We reserve the right to delete or ban comments and users who violate these guidelines.

More in Movies, Review (2085 of 7234 articles)
alanritchsonthumb