2011 was a good year for film. Good, but not great. One would think that the widespread fear of the end of the world would hustle some film-makers into their masterpieces. Some (The Artist director Michel Hazanavicius for instance) were able to make their marks before 11:59 tonight, but it seems that next year has more surprises in store than just the apocalypse.

I share many of these with my fellow movies editor Jeremy Baril, so if you haven’t yet read his list, we suggest reading it now. Ready? Okay, now you’re prepared for something slightly different.

First, we’ll begin with the Honorable Mentions:

  • Argo
  • The Bourne Legacy
  • Gravity
  • World War Z
  • Skyfall
  • Now for the PLATINUM Honorable Mentions:

  • LooperAn original story involving a hitman who has been hired to kill his future self directed by Brick helmer Rian Johnson. I’m on board.
  • Prometheus Just look at that teaser trailer. Seriously. Just look at it. I’m excited already and I haven’t even seen a single Alien film.
  • Men In Black III– I’ve always been a sucker for sequels that take place years after the original. I’m also a sucker for anything Josh Brolin decides to be a part of. Bring it on.
  • Kill Bin Laden Get this, The Hurt Locker director Kathryn Bigelow was making this film about the NAVY Seal team that was planning to kill Osama Bin Laden before Seal Team 6 killed Osama Bin Laden. After the assassination, Bigelow chose to include Bin Laden’s final moments in the film, and now she can slap the highly coveted “Based on a true story” label on the poster.
  • Paranormal Activity 4 I know, the IMDB link claims that it isn’t coming until 2014 but since Paranormal Activity 3 left room for another sequel, we can safely assume that Paramount will mount another just in time for Halloween. What are they gonna do, just drop their most successful horror franchise? They are cheap to make and audiences are gobbling them up like they are going out of style.
  • #10 Ted

    Seth McFarlane has gotten some flack over the past few years about the inevitable unfunniness of his brainchild Family Guy. Now Fox has milked his brain for all it is worth with American Dad and The Cleveland Show. There is no denying that Seth McFarlane is a very funny guy. Anyone who grew up watching the first few seasons of Family Guy and the more recent seasons of American Dad could tell you that.

    In fact, Family Guy stopped being funny the moment American Dad starting really getting laughs. Coincidence? I think McFarlane can only throw his magic touch into one project at a time, and it might be safe to say that his first upcoming feature film, written and directed by himself, might have a taste of that old school Seth McFarlane humor.

    Ted, according to creator Seth McFarlane, will follow a demented teddy bear (voiced by McFarlane) as it torments it’s owners Mila Kunis and Mark Whalberg. It sounds a little cliche, but here’s to hoping that the most successful comedian of our generation will make a glorious return to true comedy next year.

    Ted will come alive on July 13th, 2012.

    #9 The Hunger Games

    Okay, before I get flamed from every possible angle, you should all know that I am still on Chapter 4 of The Hunger Games. Those of you following my “Read The Hunger Games With Jimmy” series have been incredibly patient and I thank all of you for that. I plan on continuing the series, and I still plan on fulfilling my promise to finish my analysis of the book before the premiere.

    The trailer alone is enough to peak anyone’s interest in the film. The thought of something so brutal, so young, so modern and yet so frighteningly imaginable stirs the imagination. I already know that the book doesn’t shy away from what would actually happen in the circumstances that these characters are placed in, and I can only hope that the film version has the balls to do justice to the source material.

    The cast looks magnificent, the visuals presented in the trailer sold the ideal, and even though director Gary Ross has a past of soft and fluffy films like Big and (to a lesser extent) Seabiscuit, fellow screenwriter Billy Ray (State of Play, Breach, Suspect Zero) is sure to bring on the violence the way author Suzanne Collins (also credited as a screenwriter) intended.

    The Hunger Games will begin on March 23, 2012.

    #8 Seven Psychopaths

    Following his 2008 critical hit In Bruges (which, aside from being a Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire reunion also happens to be my own personal favorite movie of all time) long-time playwright Martin McDonagh has finally decided to follow his masterpiece with another film, again starring Collin Farrel who won the Golden Globe for his last partnership with the writing genius.

    The script leaked early last year, and although I haven’t read it (I intentionally spoil every other movie for myself by working at Hypable, why would I want to spoil this one?), those that have read it have chosen it to occupy a place of honor on their lists of the most anticipated movies of 2012.

    The photo I’ve used above has nothing to do with Seven Psychopaths and is actually a screenshot from In Bruges. If that’s not an indicator of exactly why I’m excited to see McDonagh and Farrel team up again then I don’t even know what to say. Last time it was about hitmen, this time it is about a screenwriter, a psychopath, and a dog.

    Seven Psychopaths will be released whenever it feels like it. (The actual date has not been set, but it is slated for a 2012 release.)

    #7 The Great Gatsby

    It has been years since I’ve opened The Great Gatsby, but the way that it portrayed the roaring twenties has stuck with me through the years. This will be a special treat for me, because with the exception of a few shocking events near the middle and end of the novel, I don’t very well remember every single event.

    In an instance of perfect casting, Leonardo diCaprio and Carey Mulligan have been cast as Gatsby and Daisy. To be honest, half of the reason I am so excited for this adaptation is to see Mulligan as Daisy. She has been knocking her roles out of the park for the past three years and no one could have cast the essential character better, although the choice of director (Baz Luhrmann) is a little peculiar to me even though I am an enormous fan of his.

    I seem to remember hearing reports early last year that he was planning to shoot the film in 3D, and that seemed to indicate that he would indeed be using his standard ostentatious directing method with this interpretation of the classic novel. The photos that have emerged from the set have looked perfect so far, but here’s to hoping that we wont see any green absinthe fairies in West Egg.

    The Great Gatsby will roar into theaters on December 25th, 2012.

    #6 Django Unchained

    No official artwork for Quentin Tarantino’s next film has yet been released, but artists all over the internet have given a poster for Django Unchained the good ol’ college try. This just goes to show that people all over the world are waiting for the follow up to Inglourious Basterds, which Tarantino had dubbed as his “masterpiece”.

    One could say that Tarantino has been slowly building up his fan base with every film that he makes, the landmarks being Reservoir Dogs, Pulp Fiction and Inglourious Basterds. Now with Django Unchained, Tarantino takes an all-star cast (with the likes of Jamie Foxx, Samuel L. Jackson, Cristoph Waltz, Leonardo DiCaprio, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Sacha Baron Cohen and Kurt Russel) and sets them in what he calls a true Southern tale.

    According to Tarantino, the world is full of Westerns, but this will be an authentic Southern that tells the story of a liberated slave that, with the help of a German bounty hunter, will try to rescue his wife from the cruel owners of the plantation.

    I would have seen this movie if you had just given me the cast list, but after Tarantino finally won me over with the masterful Basterds (we’ve had a love hate relationship for the past decade or so), the fact that he wrote and directed this just makes me all the more excited to see it on opening night.

    Django Unchained will be released on December 25th, 2012.

    #5 Les Miserables

    Not even musical theater nerds can agree on Les Miserables. Believe it or not, there are some out there that just don’t like it. Personally, it is the most powerful musical I have ever seen. It masterfully weaves several stories, each dealing with love and sacrifice, during the wake of the French Revolution. Although the book has been adapted into a non-musical form fairly recently, many a film-maker has glanced at this daring gargantuan musical and has swiftly said “no thanks”.

    It’s a daunting task, adapting what can be arguably called the greatest musical of all-time to the screen. Recent Best Director winner Tom Hooper seems to think that he has the chops to make people all over the world sob hysterically in their local theaters. He took the job, hired an all-star cast including Hugh Jackman, Russel Crowe, Anne Hathaway, Sacha Baron Cohen and Helena Bonham Carter, and reports now indicate that he may film the required singing live on-camera, a move that has earned him accolades not only from me, but from musical theater buffs everywhere.

    There are some that think that it simply can’t be done. Yes, there is a very distinct possibility that the three hour musical might not live up to expectations, but as of now I can’t think of a team that I would rather have than Hooper and company.

    Les Miserables will flood theaters on December 7th, 2012.

    #4 The Hobbit

    The Hobbit was my favorite book for four solid years. Before I got my hands on the Harry Potter series, I found myself getting lost in Middle-Earth every couple of months or so. I was (at the time) unable to penetrate Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings, so I found it particularly awesome when The Fellowship of the Ring came out before film-makers really thought about giving The Hobbit a try. It was truly indescribable to have a world I was so familiar with suddenly come to life on the big screen, and it was even more fascinating that it told a story that I legitimately had never heard before.

    As soon as whispers of The Hobbit started echoing through Hollywood, my inner child had to be stifled. What if they ruin it? What if it doesn’t live up to The Lord of the Rings? What if it doesn’t live up to it’s paper and ink counterpart? All of these questions were running through my head until evil genius Guillermo Del Toro signed on to direct. Frankly, I was curious how Del Toro’s vision would fit into Jackson’s pre-established Middle-Earth. Would it change, and if so would the changes be justified? I love Guillermo, so when his vision hit troubled waters I was understandably worried.

    Enter Peter Jackson, cape billowing in the wind, to take the reigns of Middle-Earth once again. Under Jackson’s rule, 90% of the original LOTR cast agreed to come back for cameos, and every Hobbit fan breathed a heaving sigh of relief knowing that they would return to Middle-Earth the same way they did back at the turn of the millenium. Now the trailer has come out, and most Tolkien-philes can rest easy knowing that their baby is safe in the hands of Jackson.

    The Hobbit will leave the Shire on December 14th, 2012.

    #3 Lincoln

    No, I’m not just excited for Lincoln because Daniel Day-Lewis bears a freakishly uncanny resemblance to my favorite president. I’m excited because: A) Daniel Day-Lewis is simply and mathematically the best actor to grace the silver screen since Marlon Brando, B) Stephen Spielberg is widely known as the best director of the past 40 years, C) It is based on the book Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln written by Pulitzer Prize-winning historian Doris Goodwin, and D) The screenplay was penned by Emmy, Tony and Pulitzer prize winning playwright Tony “he wrote freaking Angels in America” Kushner, John “The Gladiator” Logan, and Paul “this is my first screenplay, I’m just a FREAKING ABRAHAM LINCOLN HISTORIAN” Webb.


    Also, this picture of Daniel Day-Lewis wearing the Abraham Lincoln hat.

    As if this wasn’t enough reason to get excited, we already know that this project has been in Spielberg’s brain for over a decade. He was always talking about it, has worked his mind around every possible angle of it, and now he’s finally working on it and has cast every single good actor in the world to work with him on the project.

    So I guess now one question remains: Will Lincoln win every Oscar or just a handful?

    Lincoln will conquer the South on December 25th, 2012.

    #2 The Dark Knight Rises

    Unless Gone With The Wind is planning on releasing a sequel anytime soon, it might be safe to say that The Dark Knight Rises could be the most anticipated sequel of all time (now that the Harry Potter movies are done with). Fans ofThe Dark Knight were devastated when director Christopher Nolan straight up said that unless he was possessed by a truly worthy idea, the Dark Knight legacy would fall one movie short. According to Nolan, he would have rather it end at The Dark Knight if the alternative was a half-hearted threequel.

    Just as many fans justifiably jumped out of their skins when Nolan announced that not only was he planning on making a sequel, but that fan favorite Bane would be the last villain to terrorize Gotham in Christopher Nolan’s vision. Although there are still bat-fans out there that are questioning his casting choices (remember when we weren’t sure about that Brokeback Mountain actor playing the Joker?), it might just be safer to sit tight and trust that Nolan (like Batman himself) will do Gotham City justice. ‘

    As if we weren’t already excited, the six minute prologue released in IMAX convinced this writer that Nolan may have hit another one out of the park, and the trailer released shortly thereafter showed the world exactly how Bane could top The Dark Knight‘s diabolical Joker.

    The Dark Knight Rises will appear in theaters on July 20th, 2012

    #1 The Avengers

    Yes, my two most anticipated movies of the year are comic book movies. Big whoop. Wannafightaboutit? Before I am disbarred and excommunicated from the film critic society (an actual thing), take these words into your brain.

    First. Time. In. History. That’s how many times in cinematic history four major characters from four separate movies have come together for one gigantic megafilm. Fanboys were worshiping this movie before they even knew it was being made, half of them still can’t even believe that it’s actually happening, and this was all before nerd-deity Joss Whedon was crowned as writer/director of the beastly project.

    I have often called Joss Whedon the most creative person in Hollywood. Anyone who loves Buffy the Vampire Slayer can tell you that if there is someone who can write and direct the shit out of a movie about super-humans, it’s this guy. Who wasn’t angry through the roof when his genius brainchild Firefly was unjustly cancelled? Who among us has seen Dr.Horrible’s Sing-Along Blog more than eighteen times? I’m not saying the guy can do no wrong (I’m looking at you, Dollhouse), but if there is someone we can trust with the Avengers, it’s this guy. I mean, nerds, he’s one of us.

    Then the trailer came out, and anyone that doubted if the lead characters of four distinctly separate films would mix well were quickly shut up by an awesome 8 second exchange between Captain America and Tony Stark. Listeners of HeroHype know that just seeing the characters occupy the same space was enough to make true fanboys wet their pants with excitement.

    I still can’t believe it’s actually happening.

    The Avengers will assemble on May 3rd, 2012.

    So what do you think? Was there anything I missed?  What are your most anticipated films of 2012?

    Revisiting the ‘Captain America’ movie from 1990: A lost masterpiece?

    For a second there, Chris Evans almost tricked me into thinking Captain America was cool.

    10:00 am EDT, May 6, 2016

    Forget Captain America: Civil War. The 1990s straight-to-video version is where it’s at.

    A week ago, I had the pleasure of watching Captain America: Civil War, the third movie in Marvel’s esteemed Captain America trilogy.

    There is no denying that the Russo brothers have created a masterpiece. While I personally didn’t think it lived up to the expectations set by the phenomenal The Winter Soldier, the third installment of Cap’s story has everything you could ask for in a comic book movie: Beautiful people and special effects, great acting, incredible fight sequences, humor, conflict, and heart.

    But enough about Civil War. We’re here to talk about another Captain America movie — a movie I wasn’t aware existed until earlier this week, when the Screen Junkies brought it to the attention of the world.

    Related: 9 Bucky Barnes moments we want to see in future Marvel movies

    Captain America was not a property that I, a little Danish girl whose closest thing to fandom growing up was Duck Tales, was ever exposed to. I certainly don’t remember seeing this American-Yugoslavian straight-to-VHS production at my local Blockbusters, if it even came out in Europe at all.

    Honestly, this whole ‘Captain America’ thing would probably never have appealed to me if not for Avengers, in which I thought he was kind of funny (but not as funny as Thor), and later Captain America: The First Avenger, which genuinely moved me, and for a long time was the only comic book movie I had more than a passing interest in (Peggy Carter may have had something to do with that, too).

    So color me surprised when, on a dare, I decided to give the 1990s version of Cap’s saga with a 0% rating on Rotten Tomatoes a whirl, and actually… maybe… possibly… liked it?

    But wait, isn’t this the worst movie of all time?

    Captain America 1990 sucks

    Let’s get this straight: Cap ’90 sucks. It’s awful. It’s exactly what you’d expect a superhero movie made in the 90s with b-list actors would look like.

    When The First Avenger came out, ’90s-Cap Matt Salinger (yup, that Salinger) did an interview with GQ in which he admitted that the new Marvel movie, “looks like what we had hoped ours would look like.” Heartbreakingly, Salinger went on to confess that he had asked Marvel for a cameo in the movie, which they didn’t grant him. (I feel like he’s my Steve now, so this hit me really hard. Love you Matt.)

    But to be honest with you, I don’t really care that it’s objectively terrible. I sat down to watch this movie in an effort to educate myself on Captain America’s history (and to gain new appreciation for the MCU), and, maybe because I was expecting everything about it to be awful, I was honestly surprised by how much this movie got right.

    All the moral ambiguity you want in a ‘Cap’ movie

    Captain America 1990 Steve Rogers

    After Age of Ultron, there was a lot of talk about Chris Evans’ Steve being too clean, too nice, too noble. ‘Real’ Steve Rogers fans recognized that the comics character has a dark side, that he can be selfish, that he’s human.

    And, for all his buffoonery, Salinger’s Captain America actually, albeit possibly by accident, embodies a lot of the traits we look for in a flawed Steve. Twice he fakes carsickness (!), does a silly run (!), and steals an innocent person’s car (!), leaving them stranded on a deserted road because of some stubborn conviction that he doesn’t need their help (seriously, it’s so dumb and also hilarious).

    He’s allegedly a patriotic soldier whose father died in the war, and who leaves his family to become America’s first supersoldier. In the movie’s first 20 minutes, he heads straight into battle with Red Skull and falls into a pile of snow before anyone even realizes he exists, then wakes up 50 years later and heads straight back into the same battle.

    During their final confrontation, Red Skull tells him, “No one cares about you,” and Steve’s reply is, “I care.” The world isn’t aware of Captain America in this version of the story, and the values he’s supposedly upholding are irrelevant to everyone around him.

    The movie may tell us otherwise, but in actuality, Captain America is just a guy with a grudge, a would-be hero who’d never make it round the block if everyone around him didn’t jump in to help him out. (This probably wasn’t the character flaws fans had hoped for, but it is a nice change to see a supposed superhero actually having to rely so heavily on his non-superhero allies.)

    Captain America 1990 Red Skull

    Meanwhile, the movie’s villain, Red Skull, is the one with the tragic past. This was back before Hollywood knew how to make interesting good guys, and so they poured all their characterization into the villain: The movie opens with him as an innocent child in the 1930s watching his entire family get murdered, and then he’s tortured and transformed into a monster.

    Red Skull sees Steve as his ‘brother,’ and when we catch up with him in the 1990s, he’s gotten a plastic surgery overhaul, and is working with his daughter Valentina, who for all intents and purposes is his second-in-command. During WW2, Red Skull was working with the Nazis to bomb the White House (don’t worry, Steve rode that rocket all the way from Italy to Washington, and onward to Alaska!), but when that failed, he apparently decided to settle down in Rome and become a low-key Mafioso.

    In 1993 (don’t ask why this movie takes place three years after it was made, that’s just part of its magic) he has this big plan to kidnap the President and implant him with some kind of control chip, and when that also fails, he decides to just blow up everyone.

    Captain America 1990 piano

    He stands by a piano — which is significant because he was playing the piano right before the Nazis made him watch as they killed his family — and tells Cap, “We are both tragedies. And now I send our two tired souls to rest.”

    And Steve? He strikes a pose and declares, “Not if I have anything to say about it!” before using his shield to knock Red Skull off a cliff and possibly-very-likely slice the head off Valentina in the process. Subtle, this Steve is not.

    But, intentionally or not, this actually leaves us with genuine Sympathy for the Devil, a depth which The First Avenger arguably didn’t allow for (Red Skull was pure, sadistic evil in that version).

    It’s kind of feminist (no, really)

    Captain America 1990 Erskine

    I mean look, it’s the 90s and lead girl Sharon not-Carter totally gets locked in a cell, Ultron-style. But pretty astoundingly, none of the ladies in the movie — of which there are quite a few — are ever actually damsels.

    The Erskine character played in the Marvel movies by Stanley Tucci is actually a woman in the movie, named Doctor Maria Vaselli. She starts out as a Nazi scientist working on the Red Skull serum, but when she sees what they do to the kid she rebels and, when they try to shoot her, escapes.

    She begins working with the American government to improve the serum, and by the time Steve is all ready for his dose, she’s still around. She’s killed, of course, like Erskine is, but having a woman in such a position of authority in the 1930s, so matter-of-factly, just reminds me that the ’90s were a lot more chill about what we’d consider ‘progressive’ in 2016.

    Captain America 1990 Bernie

    Then there’s Peggy Bucky Bernie, Steve’s one true love who promises to wait for him “forever, and ever, and ever and ever.” You think she’s just a doe-eyed love interest until we catch back up with her 50 years later. Turns out Peggy Bucky Bernie did wait for Steve, but not forever.

    When Steve finds her, she tells him she waited till she was 38, then basically said ‘f*** it’ and got married and had some kids, because she wasn’t actually gonna let her life pass her by. When she confesses that she feels old and ugly compared to him, he tells her she’s beautiful, which is also kind of neat, in this age of women being told they’re ‘too old’ to exist at age 26.

    Later she dies, killed by Red Skull’s daughter, and we learn that even when her life was on the line, she never gave up any information about Steve — a hero, in her own, quiet way.

    Captain America 1990 Sharon

    And then there’s Bernie’s daughter Sharon. If you thought Civil War made it weird with Sharon being Peggy’s niece, oh boy — not only could this Sharon have been Steve’s daughter in another life, but the two women are also played by the same actress!

    But Sharon, for all that she’s not the awesome, badass Agent 13-version of Sharon we meet in the MCU, is actually a pretty refreshing lead female character. For one, she’d never explicitly made Cap’s love interest, and she’s also got a very specific non-romance-related reason for tagging along with him.

    Captain America 1990 women

    “We get our orders from the Red Skull’s daughter”

    When Bernie dies, Steve mourns for about 0.1 seconds, but Sharon is obviously devastated. She follows Steve to Rome in order to confront Red Skull, and learns that Valentina is the one who killed her mother. Sharon finds herself up against Red Skull’s daughter several times (and the two even have a few conversations that earns Cap ’90 a pass on the Bechdel Test), before she ultimately punches her in the face. Cap might be the one to kill Valentina, but Sharon definitely got her moment.

    At one point, Sharon also pulls Steve’s own silly car stealing trick on him, basically sacrificing herself by letting Red Skull’s henchmen catch her so Steve can get away (if you’ve seen Civil War, this might ring a bell).

    Okay but it’s still awful, right?

    Captain America 1990 Red Skull 2

    Oh don’t worry, it’s terrible.

    For one, the movie does absolutely nothing to explain what the serum actually did to Steve, other than cure his limp. He’s stronger and can throw a frisbee with deadly accuracy, and that’s about it… but in fairness, I guess that’s kind of true for Evans’ Cap, too. The lack of a physical change — he’s a dopey dude and post-serum he’s still a dopey dude — really diminishes the effect of him, however, especially considering the dorky costume they make him wear.

    Also, Cap freezes in the ice within the first 30 minutes, and beyond being mildly wary of tape recorders seems completely unperturbed by the world of 1993. There’s no Black Widow, or Bucky, or Howard Stark, or any of the other people the MCU have taught me to assume would of course be present in a Captain America movie.

    Captain America 1990 kid

    “Pictures don’t lie and neither do best friends”

    There is however a President Kimball, a super sympathetic Al Gore-type environmentalist, who ends up helping out with the whole saving-the-day thing (this is a movie about Captain ‘Murica after all).

    Tom Kimball actually saw the rocket-surfing Steve back in the ’40s, and the transition from the ’40s to the ’90s is done through newspaper clippings showing how Tom went from a boy who dreamed of being the president, to the actual president (that part was actually really cool, even if they made a really obvious spelling error — see below).

    Captain America 1990 newspaper

    He also keeps up with his childhood best friend Sam, and their friendship through the film actually feels genuine, amidst all the terrible stunt coordination and one-liners.

    Sam, who helpfully drops a Human Torch reference (Chris Evans, it was meant to be), continues to believe in Tom’s Captain America, even after Cap leaves him stranded on a highway. And when Sam is killed, still in an effort to protect Cap — who gives no f***s — he leaves Tom some kind of decoder locket thing he’s had since they were kids. #ImagineYourOTP

    Captain America suffers from spectacularly bad production value, and some misguided (and half-assed, to its benefit) attempt to make Captain America a stoic, square-jawed Superman rip-off. The punch sound effects are taken straight out of a cartoon, some of the backdrops are laughable, and Steve’s actual character arc is non-existent: He’s a good soldier who wants to be a good soldier and continues to be a good soldier — his only real personality trait is that he likes to pretend he’s gonna barf and then steal people’s cars.

    Captain America 1990 woman

    But around the epic fail of the hero himself, there’s actually a semblance of an interesting story. There’s a tragic villain ripped from his family and forced to become a monster, raising his daughter to be a leader in her own right. There’s a strong-willed girl who loses a parent and follows the one man who may bring her justice, and there’s a president whose faith in this mythical Captain America may be an expression of his faith in a better world — a faith which, if the desperation and ill-contained frustration of our contemporary Captain America is anything to go by, we’re collectively beginning to lose.

    Am I giving this movie too much credit? Absolutely. It’s cheesy, badly made, and not very much fun. But it’s also dark — a child is tortured, a family is gunned down, and Red Skull’s daughter has to listen to a recording of her grandparents being killed — and, of course, there are cool chicks doing motorcycle stunts. At the end of the day, there’s a lot to enjoy about the 1990s version of Captain America.

    As someone whose knowledge of Cap pretty much begins and ends with Chris Evans’ MCU version, I was actually pleasantly surprised by this supposedly-and-actually-awful, but still surprisingly solid, Captain America movie.

    “Listen to me!”
    “No time, Flyboy.”

    With lines like that, what’s not to love?

    Marvel’s Doctor Strange director Scott Derrickson has heard your concerns about the movie’s whitewashing.

    Sometimes “complaining on the Internet” actually works — because sometimes you have intelligent arguments, that can’t be ignored.

    This seems to be the case for fans voicing concerns about Doctor Strange, Marvel’s upcoming supernatural superhero film starring Benedict Cumberbatch as the titular doctor, and Tilda Swinton as the gender- and race-bent Ancient One.

    When the trailer came out, it was followed by an immediate outcry of concerns over the movie’s seeming appropriation and erasure of Asian culture.

    While everyone agrees that Tilda Swinton will do a fantastic job as the Ancient One, deciding to make the character of Celtic origin — while still placing her in Asia (decidedly not Tibet) — doesn’t sit well with fans and professionals in Hollywood who are tired of the lack of Asian representation on screen.

    As our Donya Abramo argued in her brilliant article on the topic:

    “By removing The Ancient One’s Tibetan origins, yet keeping the setting decidedly Asian, they have been erased from the narrative entirely, and the movie has shifted into more explicit Orientalist overtones. It makes it incredibly difficult to celebrate a female Ancient One at the expense of other, much needed representation — and there are certainly enough Asian and Asian American actors that both could have happened. It also sets a dangerous precedent that there are only two options for Asians in Hollywood: stereotype or invisible.”

    The situation was only made worse when Marvel released a statement about the issue, claiming to have a “very strong record of diversity in its casting,” and that making the Ancient One’s origin Celtic is an example of how Marvel “regularly departs from stereotypes.”

    Asian industry professionals Hollywood have been particularly outspoken about the issues with this, and now, Scott Derrickson has revealed via Twitter that he’s paying attention:

    While the movie is done and dusted, it’s always wonderful to see directors acknowledge the backlash to their perpetuation of tropes or erasure (similarly, we’ve recently seen the Russo brothers call out the need for LGBT representation in Marvel movies), as opposed to insisting there isn’t a problem to begin with — and we can only hope that the studios are listening and learning, too!

    ‘Doctor Strange’ hits theaters on November 4, 2016

    ‘Center Stage’ gets a summer sequel on Lifetime

    Nothing left for us to do but DANCE!

    8:45 pm EDT, May 5, 2016

    The first trailer for Center Stage: On Pointe is the latest addition to the long list of nostalgia-inducing films arriving this summer.

    Forget that 2008 sequel, this is the Center Stage fans deserve. It seems that once every eight years the team from Center Stage needs to scratch an itch and dance out their feelings on screen. While we’d rather forget the failed straight-to-DVD attempt of the mid-aughts, Lifetime’s made for TV movie is just the right amount of nostalgia fans deserve.

    Once again we are set in the throws of the audition process for The American Ballet Company. Wait. Does that mean? Yes! Both Peter Gallahger and Ethan Stiefel, Jonathan Reeves and Cooper Nielson respectively, are back for the film! Also joining the group is dancer-turned-choreographer, and the heartthrob of all twenty-something former dance camp attendees, Charlie (Sascha Radetsky).

    We are not worthy.


    Source

    Watch the trailer for ‘Center Stage: On Pointe’

    The synopsis of the film, from E!, reads: “Jonathan Reeves (Gallagher) is tasked with infusing more contemporary styles and modernism into the American Ballet Academy and enlists his top choreographers Charlie (Radestsky), Cooper (Stiefel) and Tommy (Kenny Wormald) to recruit dancers to compete at an intensive camp where the winners will be selected to join the Academy. Bella Parker (Nicole Munoz), who has always lived in the shadow of her hugely successful sister Kate, finally gets her chance to step into the limelight as one of the dancers selected for the camp. Chloe Lukasiak (Dance Moms) stars as Gwen, a talented dancer prodigy who competes at the camp.”

    Because we know you want it…

    Will you be tuning in to ‘Center Stage: On Pointe’ this summer?