Best and Worst Movie Posters of 2012

2:00 pm EDT, December 31, 2012

Every year, fandoms and movie lovers the world over get hundreds of new movie posters (sometimes 10 or 12 from the same movie) and there are always a few that elicit an “Oooo!” of excitement, or an “Ugh!” of disgust. Some that we hate may be from movies we love, and occasionally we even love posters from movies we hate.

As we are HUGE movie junkies, it’s sometimes hard to pick and choose from the myriad of options out there, especially when you try and choose between genres. Do you go for the poster for the drama that’s beautifully crafted and intricate, or the option from the cheeky indie comedy that makes you smile? And where does that leave our fandom movies that we love on principle? How are you supposed to choose?!

While our favorites may not always match up with everyone elses’ opinions, it’s always fun to take a look back and try and select the best and worst from the year past, so we wanted to highlight a few of the hits and misses in the movie poster business from 2012. Let’s start with the best…

The Best

10. 21 Jump Street

There is just something about this poster that represents high school prom in all the best ways… balloons, banners, streamer curtains, plus there’s the added bonus of Channing Tatum and Jonah Hill in white tuxes. While it may not be screaming creativity or anything, this poster represents everything that the movie is, and it does so brilliantly.

9. Jeff Who Lives at Home

Anyone with siblings knows that this poster says so much, and with very little. You get the immediate impression that this movie isn’t flashy or over the top, but you will get a good look at a pair of brothers and how they function as a family. The wood paneling and dated photos transport you back to your childhood home and get you in the perfect mindset for this movie.

8. Wanderlust

There’s just something refreshing about a poster that doesn’t even need the faces of the leads to be compelling that makes us smile. How can you not feel the freedom bursting out of this poster? It makes us want to kick off our shoes & join in, and whether or not you liked the movie itself, this poster just puts us in a good mood.

7. Moonrise Kingdom

The old school feel of this poster is what makes it so remarkable. Upon seeing it, we were not only drawn back into the world of the movie, but it made us nostalgic for old class photos from school, and giant group shots from summer camp. I can almost smell the pine woodchips and the smoldering campfires now…

6. Brave

While there is still a dramatically mixed reaction to this movie, it is hard to deny the beauty drawn into the vista in this poster. The green of the hills and the red of Merida’s hair bring an undeniably Scottish air to the visuals and surely do their job in enticing you into the breathtaking world of Brave.

5. Beasts of the Southern Wild

Such a simple poster, but it’s dramatic and effective nonetheless. The colors and unfocused realness of the design entice us to dive into this little girl’s world and find out what exactly Beasts of the Southern Wild is all about.

4. Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter

While this may seem a little controversial, we find this poster simply fabulous. The idea of Abraham Lincoln hunting vampires is campy and ridiculous, but this poster manages to make the whole idea seem credible, while also creating a beautiful nighttime backdrop that sets the scene perfectly. We weren’t sure there was a way to make such a stunning poster for such a crazy movie, but the people behind Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter definitely knew what they were doing.

3. Killing Them Softly

In many ways, simple is best. This poster represents that idea in the all the best ways. It highlights the idea of the movie without going over the top or committing the cardinal sin of bad movie posters, slapping the lead in the center of the poster to eliminate all need for creativity. This film is all about guns for hire and how they handle death, and nothing illustrates that better than a bloody thumbprint and a business card.

2. The Master

The Master lead award show discussion for quite a bit of the fall film season, but has been overshadowed in the wake of nominations for the Critics Choice and Golden Globes. When it comes to movie posters though, this is the perfect way to highlight the general feel of the movie without going over the top. It subtly gives you ideas of the dated setting of the film, and the use of the water line gives a subtle hint to where this film will take place without beating you over the head with it. The beautiful simplicity seriously gives this poster an edge over its competition.

1. Les Miserables

There was a great potential for disaster with this poster, but Tom Hooper and company nailed it. Based upon the iconic image of little Cosette that has graced numerous playbills and programs the world over, the movie poster manages to pay homage to that of the stage show, while also painting a realistic idea of what this film is going to be. Les Miserables is a classic musical that is bound to succeed, and with posters like this, there is no doubt as to why.

THE WORST

10. Flight

While the movie has had mixed reviews, this poster makes our worst list at number 10 due to 2 distinct things. One, the simplicity of this poster would make a real impact if it wasn’t so confusing. If this movie is ultimately about a plane crash and the life of the pilot, why does this poster not, at least, show a plane in freefall, or at least slanted toward the ground. Two, a person could gather from the title alone that this movie includes airplanes, so what more do we learn from this poster? The answer is nothing. Basically, we just expected more.

9. Cloud Atlas

This poster represents everything that is wrong with large ensemble cast film posters these days. While we understand the desire to put all those gorgeous faces on one poster, it ends up just feeling muddled and overdone. Not to mention that the resulting collage of heads ends up looking like some creepy monster. Plus, for a movie as complex as Cloud Atlas, surely there is a better way to represent the film that with a typical comic book style fashion…

8. Dark Shadows

While this poster isn’t a total disaster, it makes our list because it raises more questions than answers, which may be good for a movie, but it spells disaster for a poster. First of all, why is everyone’s skin tone the exact same as Johnny Depp, who is supposed to be playing a vampire? It almost seems as if they all decided to splash flour all over their faces, and, frankly, looks a bit ridiculous. Also, this has to be one of the lamest taglines of the year. “Every family has its demons.” Really? Yeah, we aren’t even gonna go there.

7. Celeste and Jesse Forever

This poster for Celeste and Jesse Forever makes the list basically due to boredom. It doesn’t inspire much desire to see the movie and it doesn’t give much of an idea as to what this story is all about. Also, its not exactly a great picture of the two leads, and they are not ugly folk. Frankly, we just expected more. When you have such amazing talents to showcase in Rashida Jones and Andy Samberg, surely the poster could pack more punch.

6. Hope Springs

We all know that Meryl Streep is amazing and there is no doubt that we all adore her, so nothing against the lady, but this poster is quite… weird. First, if you stare at her hand that is touching her face long enough, it starts to seem like maybe her hand shouldn’t bend that way, which just weirded us out. Also, there had to be a better way to sell a movie about an older couple spicing things up in their marriage than with Meryl Streep in a bookstore.

5. The Apparition

No offense to Ashley Greene, but in this poster, she looks more pissed off than scared, which throws the whole idea of this scary movie into jeopardy. Plus, are those human hands? Or ghostly hands? And why is she naked? The weirdness of all of those questions equals the sum total of why this poster made our worst list. Now we have to just stop looking at it…

4. Playing for Keeps

Why does photoshopping actors and actresses onto colored blocks make producers think people are going to pay to see the movie? If we had never seen a trailer for this movie, we would have no idea that Gerard Butler is playing a retired soccer stud who coaches a little league team. While you can probably guess that this is some sort of romantic comedy, this poster does nothing to sell the film, and if the powers behind the movie can’t sell it, maybe it’s just not worth seeing.

3. Joyful Noise

One look at this poster and an unsettling question arises… What kind of auditorium has a balcony like that and sits the audience on both sides of the stage? It just made us wonder where exactly the stage is in that place. We get that sometimes you’re supposed to suspend belief in a movie, but a poster that seems to defy logic usually just leaves us scratching our heads, rather than running to the box office to buy a ticket.

2. Chasing Mavericks

What exactly are Gerard Butler and the other guy (what’s his name again?) supposed to be doing in this poster? They don’t seem to be looking at each other, and the placement of their floating heads just seems awkward. Well, at least we’ve been given a wave in the picture so we know that this movie is about surfing. With a title like Chasing Mavericks, it could be about anything, so at least we get a hint. Overall, this poster just fails in one too many ways…

1. Katy Perry: Part of Me

Lastly, our worst movie poster of the year goes to Katy Perry: Part of Me, and it has nothing to do with her, or her purple hair. Mostly, how is a poster in which she is sitting in popcorn supposed to inspire us to go to the theatre? It sort of just grossed us out, thinking about people sitting in our popcorn. Plus, there’s that really awkward look on her face. Poor Katy.

Well, there we are! Our 10 best and worst movie posters from this year. We hope you may have discovered 1 or 2 new ones, or maybe you have a favorite that we didn’t mention (or one that you just HATED). Sound off in the comments below and let us know what you thought about this year’s stock of movie posters.

Quiz: What is your pet’s Ilvermorny house?

Why should you be the only one who gets a second wizarding house?

1:00 pm EDT, July 29, 2016

Will your pet be sorted into the same Ilvermorny house as you, or will you have to disown them for joining your rival?

Step aside Hogwarts, there’s a new wizarding school in town (or rather, across the sea)! With a new school comes new houses, and a new sorting test. You might’ve gone through an identity crisis after taking the test for yourself, but you’re not the only one who needs sorting. That furry, scaly, or feathery friend needs to know where they belong too, and we’re here to do just that! Last time we helped you find out what Hogwarts house your pet would be sorted into, so now we’ll help you figure out what Ilvermorny house they belong in.

It’s typical for pets to have similar personalities to their owners, so maybe your pet will end up in the same house as you. But to those who have house rivalries, brace yourselves: It’s also possible your pet will end up in a different house than you, maybe even your rival house! Will you be saying ‘bye bye birdie,’ or do you thrive in competition? That probably depends on your Hogwarts and Ilvermorny house.

Whether you have a dog, cat, rabbit, bird, or reptile, all pets are welcome at Hypable’s Ilvermorny sorting ceremony! Take the quiz below and let us know where your pet’s loyalties lie, and be sure to take it for each of your pets (unless they’re a squib. Is there an American name for squib?). Don’t want any of them to feel left out!


Now that you know your pet’s Ilvermorny house, maybe you’ll want to decorate their bed with their house crest (shoutout to the Hufflepuffs)! Or maybe you’ll forbid them from entering your room if they’re in a different house (shoutout to the Slytherins)!

Did your pet get the same Ilvermorny house as you?

Forget seeing Luke Cage and Daisy Johnson in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. According to Jeph Loeb, it’s simply too hard to plan.

Although the Marvel movies and TV series ostensibly exist in the same universe, and although Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. does its best to include Avengers references whenever possible, TV show characters are unlikely to ever show up in the movies.

This despite Chloe Bennet’s continued efforts to remind people that she is, in fact, Marvel’s first on-screen female Asian superhero, and the awesome crossover possibilities the Marvel Netflix series have opened up.

Marvel fans have long been aware of the difficulties of bringing TV characters into the movie ‘verse, but at the 2016 TCAs, Jeph Loeb provided a few more reasons for why it’s practically impossible to coordinate.

“Part of the challenge of doing this sort of thing is that the movies are planned out years in advance of what it is that we are doing,” Loeb says, as quoted by SlashFilm. “Television moves at an incredible speed. The other part of the problem is that when you stop and think about it, if I’m shooting a television series and that’s going to go on over a six-month or eight-month period, how am I going to get Mike [Colter] to be able to go be in a movie? I need Mike to be in a television show.”

In terms of planning out the character arcs, this makes a lot of sense. A Marvel movie might be mapped out years in advance of production, for not to mention release, which means any character scheduled to appear would need to have their stories planned for many seasons in advance. The continuity would certainly be hard to keep track of.

Of course they could still throw in cameos, which fans would probably really appreciate — and crossovers from movies-TV are much more doable, as evidenced by Maria Hill (Cobie Smulders), Nick Fury (Samuel L. Jackson) and Lady Sif (Jaimie Alexander)’s multiple appearances on AoS.

But Marvel is wary of doing that too much, too, because “we never want to be known as an Easter egg farm. It has to work within the story. We never want to do Luke Cage gets into a cab as Foggy Nelson and Matt Murdock are getting out of the cab,” Loeb says, referencing The Man From U.N.C.L.E..

However, don’t lose hope yet. “Anything is possible,” says Loeb. “As I often get reported by you folks for saying #ItsAllConnected, our feeling is that the connection isn’t just whether or not somebody is walking into a movie or walking out of a television show. It’s connected in the way that the shows come from the same place, that they are real, that they are grounded.”

Would you like to see Marvel TV and movie characters cross over more?

If Emily Blunt and Lin-Manuel Miranda weren’t enough to get you excited about Mary Poppins Returns, maybe Meryl Streep’s name on the roster will do the trick.

Mary Poppins Returns is not a remake of the original 1964 classic but rather a sequel to the Julie Andrews-led musical. As such, it stands to reason that we’ll be getting some new characters this time around. One of those characters will be Miranda’s Jack, who will be a street lamplighter.

And, according to Variety, another one of those new characters will also be portrayed by none other than Meryl Streep, who will be taking on the role of Mary Poppins’ cousin, Topsy. And, yes, the legendary actress will be taking on a singing role for the film.

This will also reunite Streep with her Into the Woods co-star Blunt, as well as Director Rob Marshall and Producer Marc Platt. Streep played the Witch in Into the Woods, while Blunt portrayed the Baker’s Wife opposite James Corden.

Disney’s official synopsis for Mary Poppins Returns reads:

Blunt has been cast as Mary Poppins and Miranda will play a new character, a street lamplighter named Jack. Drawing from the wealth of material in P.L. Travers’ seven additional novels, the story will take place in Depression-era London (when the books were originally written) and follows a now-grown Jane and Michael Banks, who, along with Michael’s three children, are visited by the enigmatic Mary Poppins following a personal loss. Through her unique magical skills, and with the aid of her friend Jack, she helps the family rediscover the joy and wonder missing in their lives.

Mary Poppins Returns and will hit theaters December 25, 2018.

Are you on board with ‘Mary Poppins Returns’ now that Meryl Streep has joined the cast?