Admission, starring Tina Fey and Paul Rudd, hits theaters today and director Paul Weitz had more than a few things to say about his ultra-funny stars in a recent interview with Hypable.

With two stars coming from the ultimate of comedic backgrounds, it seems that Admission (read our review here) can do no wrong. Director Paul Weitz had to face the challenge of balancing comedy with heartfelt drama in the film adaptation of Jean Hanff Korelitz’s book, and having two stars that share an incredible sense of humor really helped Weitz during the production.

“They’re both nice, obviously, which is a really big thing,” said Weitz. “My brother (New Moon director Chris Weitz) and I, you know, we started doing American Pie which had no, you know, it had Eugene Levy in it. He was the most famous person in it,” laughed Weitz. “We had this ‘no assholes’ rule where we wouldn’t work with someone who we heard was an asshole. Years later I learned that was a really good rule to have.”

Since the word on the street was that neither Fey or Rudd were assholes, they both scored starring roles in Weitz’s film, and the director has even gone so far as to say that he wouldn’t have done the film had Fey not signed on.

Before Fey even arrived on the set, Weitz took to her personal biography, Bossypants to glean an idea of who she was as a person. “It was really good to have Bossypants to read ahead of time. It’s pretty revealing. I knew that, you know, I kinda got some sense from that of what she cared about,” said Weitz. “The star has a lot of power on the set and you need to be making the same film as them, so there was a lot of talk ahead of time about what the film was about and the decisions being made.”

AdmissionWith the kind of heart that beats at the center of Admission, it was important for Fey to understand the tone so that she could adjust her performance to better suit what the film was aiming for.

“With Tina, I turned to the screenplay and I walked her beat by beat through the plot before we got involved, because I needed to know that she was up for this version of the movie,” said Weitz.

Although the director had a strong vision for the direction he wanted to take the film, it still continued to be a collaboration between everyone involved, including Fey. “Tina was great in terms of coming up with jokes, and also she had some really good ideas about some of the dramatic scenes.”

Weitz continued to go into detail about how Fey provided something more carnal than he had originally envisioned for a crucial scene in the film, but for spoilers-sake we won’t go into detail here. You’ll find out when you see Admission for yourself, but just take note that it was Fey’s idea to “do it on the floor.”

Weitz said that Fey’s animalistic instinct caught him by surprise, but according to the director, that’s half the fun of the job. “It’s much more interesting when people do something that you didn’t expect,” said Weitz, though he maintained that there still had to be a sense of balance when improvising. “If you’re really riffing on a scene you forget what the scene’s about,” said Weitz.

Weitz has made a specialty out of adapting books to fit the silver screen, and Admission was no exception. Coming from the book of the same name written by author Jean Hanff Korelitz, Weitz discussed a few scenes that he wished could have fit into the film, but as with any shift from book to film, some moments just didn’t work.

“There are a certain number of flashbacks to Tina’s character as an undergrad,” explained Weitz. “That would’ve been challenging to do and have the film not be ridiculous.” At the moment, we can only imagine Fey as an undergrad at an aviary museum taking pictures of the “many different types of sparrows,” so yes, that may have been a little ridiculous.

admission-paul-weitz-paul-rudd-tina-feyThough ridiculousness isn’t the worst thing for a comedy, Weitz decided early on he wanted to center on truth in order to tell the story with as much honesty as possible. “The characters have to not feel like they’re in a comedy,” said Weitz, though he admits that separating the line between the actor and the character can be a challenge.

“I had to think about whether or not her character has a sense of humor,” said Weitz, trying to draw a line between Fey and her on-screen persona, Portia. “Clearly Tina does, but her character might have a really dorky sense of humor. You kinda see that when she’s trying to tell jokes to the cow that’s giving birth to calm him down.”

Although making this distinction between Fey’s real-life comedic sense and Portia’s crippling awkwardness was a challenge, Weitz admits that it’s one of his favorite aspects of the job. “The thing I maybe enjoy most about directing is the game of “let’s pretend” that you have with the actor where you’re talking about this imaginary character and you’re trying to erase this line between the actor and the character, and really between yourself and the character too,” said Weitz.

More than anything, Weitz wanted to ensure that he had remained faithful to Korelitz’s original vision, though he admits that as a completely different art medium, you need to also make it your own. “You’re always taking some angle on a book and adapting it,” said Weitz. “The only thing I make damn sure to do is to talk to the author about what I’m doing and in this case I think Jean was excited that Tina was gonna play the character, and she was cool with me giving the version that I thought would be a good film.”

According to Weitz, Korelitz has seen and enjoyed the film, though he does leave a little wiggle room for her in the truth department. “She’s either a really terrific liar or she loved the film,” laughed Weitz. Korelitz was involved in the production of the film to an extent, though her son had the distinct honor of appearing in the film as one of Nelson’s buddies in the party scene.

At the moment, Weitz is circling a film adaptation of yet another novel called Bel Canto, which follows the story of a renowned soprano that goes down to a Latin American country to sing at the birthday party of Katsumi Hosokawa, a Japanese industrialist. The party is interrupted by a group of terrorists looking for the President, and when it’s revealed to them that the President didn’t attend the party, the terrorists are forced to remain there with their hostages for months.

According to Weitz, the book was inspired by a real event in Peru, and although it represents a challenge to the director, he still wants to give it a shot.

Admission hits theaters today.

Click here to check out our review of Admission and be sure to catch it in theaters this weekend!

Fox has moved the third and final Maze Runner movie to 2018.

The cast and crew were only a few days into filming The Death Cure in March when Dylan O’Brien suffered serious injuries on set, prompting the production to be put on a break so he could recover. When his recovery ended up taking longer than expected, the production was put on an indefinite hold.

Now, a plan to resume the shoot seems to be in place. Fox announced Friday The Death Cure will be hitting theaters January 12, 2018, which is nearly a year later than the original February 2017 date. The last Maze Runner movie, The Scorch Trials, opened last September.

Production on The Maze Runner: The Death Cure likely won’t resume until late this year or early next. Dylan O’Brien has already committed to another movie which is expected to shoot this summer.

Getting the rest of the cast and crew back together to shoot The Maze Runner finale may be a bit of a challenge since they may’ve committed to other projects that were supposed to be shooting after they finished The Maze Runner. However, the new Death Cure release date suggests Fox has found a time that’ll work for everyone.

Tom Cavanagh will return to The Flash in season 3 as a series regular, though which character he’ll be playing remains to be seen.

Cavanagh has had a unique acting challenge on The Flash, playing a different version of his character in each of the first two seasons — and now it looks like he’ll be doing it for a third season in a row, as EW confirms that he will be a series regular in season 3.

In season 1, Cavanagh played Eobard Thawne, aka the Reverse Flash, in Harrison Wells’ body. Thawne, after traveling back in time, killed the original Wells and took his form to expedite the development of the particle accelerator so he could return to his own time. Thawne was written out of existence in the season 1 finale, though, leaving fans curious about who Cavanagh would be playing in season 2.

This past season, Cavanagh played the Earth-2 version of Harrison Wells, nicknamed Harry, who was a significantly different character from the man we thought was Wells in season 1. However, in the season 2 finale, Harry and his daughter, Jesse, returned to Earth-2.

The Flash season 2, episode 6 recap Wells

So, who does that leave for Cavanagh to play in the third season?

My guess would be the Earth-1 version of Harrison Wells, who we only briefly met in a flashback in season 1. Why the original Wells? Because in the final moments of the season 2 finale, Barry traveled back in time and stopped Thawne from killing his mother. This means the timeline in which Thawne killed Wells and took his form no longer exists, so Earth-1 Wells would be the version left alive.

Assuming he does play the original version of the character, the one who was killed and had his identity stolen, it will be interesting to see Cavanagh inhabit yet another version of the character. While we already met Wells briefly in the flashback to his death, that was a small sample size. I look forward to seeing him differentiate another Wells from those he’s already played for entire seasons.

Are you excited to see more Tom Cavanagh on ‘The Flash’?

‘Glee’ alum Mark Salling indicted on child pornography charges

The actor is facing a lot of jail time.

4:55 pm EDT, May 27, 2016

Following an arrest in December, Glee star Mark Salling (who played Puck on the Fox series) is now facing child pornography charges.

A federal grand jury has charged the 33-year-old actor with two counts of child pornography after a search of his home turned up “thousands” of images and videos involving children, TMZ reports. He will be arraigned in early June.

Salling’s charges potentially come with big sentences: 5 to 20 years in prison for receiving child porn, and another 20 years for possessing it.

After Glee went off air last year, Salling has worked on only one project: The action movie Adi Shankar’s Gods and Secrets which is slated to hit theaters later this year.

The actor has been in trouble with the law before — he was sued for sexual battery in 2013.