Home
  • Like Us On Facebook
    • Like us on Facebook

  • +1 Us on Google
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Search
Hypable

There are precious few instances where a film can transcend its genre trappings, plot and narrative to emote so splendidly the faults of our times. Such is the case with The Hunger Games, a cautionary tale of sorts that confronts the audience with difficult questions and themes in an almost aggressive manner, highlighting the insecurities and low-points of our own culture through the abhorrent act of forcibly sentencing children to their deaths. With a refreshing approach to pop cinema, director Gary Ross has created a harrowing and ultimately satisfying take on Suzanne Collins’ best-selling novel, with wonderful performances and challenging themes and execution that overpower any issues to deliver a fine piece of cinema.

For those unfamiliar with the now-phenomenon of a story, The Hunger Games is a sort of post-apocalyptic vision of America, where the powerful Capitol has taken control of Panem, and twelve districts of an unsuccessful uprising now live subject to its wrath. In an attempt to maintain an iron-clad grip on these districts, the Hunger Games were put into place. Every year, each district must produce a boy and girl between the ages of 12-18 to compete in a fight to the death on state-wide television. Twenty-four young men and women enter the Hunger Games, and one is crowned victor. As the sinister President Snow (Donald Sutherland) so eloquently puts it, a winner is selected to give the districts hope, the only thing more powerful than fear.

As the “Reaping” – the drawing of participants – for the 74th annual Hunger Games approaches, our heroine Katniss Everdeen (Jennifer Lawrence) is dealt the emotional and startling blow of having her younger sister, Prim (Willow Shields), picked for the games. Katniss courageously volunteers to protect her sister, and in doing so faces certain death and the realization she will never see her sister, mother, or even her best friend, Gale (Liam Hemsworth), again.

Katniss is joined by Peeta Mellark (Josh Hutcherson) as tribute for district 12, and under the guidance of past Hunger Games winner Haymitch Abernathy (Woody Harrelson), the eccentric chaperone Effie Trinket (Elizabeth Banks), and the kind stylist Cinna (Lenny Kravitz), Katniss and Peeta are prepared in the Capitol for “the arena,” the site in which they must challenge the “tributes” from other outlying districts to this brutal fight. The Games are just as much about politics and pleasing the powerful as they are about survival.

Taking perhaps a tad too much time at the set-up to the brutal and heartbreaking “Hunger Games,” the ultimate pay-off is a good one. Effectively toning down the more brutal, R-rated aspects of the novel, the brutality and emotional effectiveness of the movie is never really put into question as a PG-13 film. In telling this story through Katniss’ eyes, Ross is able to ensure nothing gets watered down while still avoiding excess.

Gary Ross has ensured this is Katniss’ movie. While the film boasts a larger scope and cast of important characters and situations beyond the immediate awareness of the film’s strong heroine, much of the success of the film lies in the hands of Jennifer Lawrence. There has been much comparison between The Hunger Games and Winter’s Bone – the 2010 film which earned Lawrence a Best Actress nom – and that happens to be an apt comparison, but not quite in the ways one might expect. While both characters are strong, independent woman who have to rely on their own skill and abilities for survival and both are strong performances, the comparisons go past just Lawrence.

Ross and cinematographer Tom Stern have approached The Hunger Games with a uniquely intimate style, making the film look and feel awfully like Winter’s Bone. Though telling a very grand, stylish and grotesque story, the film looks and feels very intimate and small, thanks in large part to the handheld style of shooting. Coupled with editing from Stephen Mirrione and Juliette Welfling that feels immediate and visceral, The Hunger Games manages to imbue Katniss’ perspective and emotional reactions to occurrences that are otherwise harrowing and grand in scale.

It is an impressive achievement that Ross is able to create such an intimate, bleak and stripped-down feel, even within the decadence of the Capitol. Within the over-the-top hair, costumes, set designs, and even personalities of the Capitol’s citizens, Ross always returns the narrative to its core characters and their inner struggles. In addition to Katniss, Josh Hutcherson’s Peeta has several scenes that display such emotional honesty it pulls the film away from its more lavish moments.

Amongst uniformly outstanding performances from Capitol citizens and key players within the Hunger Games, Stanley Tucci as the commentator and interviewer Caesar Flickerman stands out. The flamboyance, personality and almost uncomfortable charm represent the faux reality the “Games” hold for the people of the Capitol. Lenny Kravitz, meanwhile, is pitch perfect as Cinna, Katniss’ stylist and quiet beacon of hope within the mayhem of the Capitol. Ross takes the liberty of adding a few scenes that do a terrific job of building up themes and future developments in the world. A terrific scene that I referenced earlier is one between President Snow and chief game-maker Seneca Crane (Wes Bentley), which touches on the brewing threat Katniss poses to the Capitol. Another heartbreaking added scene is one that illustrates the beginning of the rebellion in the districts. These brief sequences – directed by Oscar-winner Steven Soderbergh – not only work emotionally within the story and narrative but remind of recent turmoil in our world, which makes these scenes of anger and frustration even more impactful.

The script by Ross, Collins, and Billy Ray is admirably faithful to the events of the novel, while capturing a cinematic feel that works as strongly as cinema as it did on the page. In fact, one issue with this adaptation is how closely it follows the build-up to the “Games,” where it drags at times in the early-going. Ross has such a clear vision of how powerful and representative these themes are of our times that he has the ability to add to the source material in astounding and heartbreaking ways.

One of the ways in which this power is achieved visually is through the use of handheld camera movement, which isn’t exactly “shaky” in the sense we’ve come to know from numerous films but has a lot of movement in it. This style enables us to really delve into Katniss’ perspective. Where the shaky-cam doesn’t work is in hand-to-hand combat within the arena, which often becomes tiresome and doesn’t really hold the same impact as the technique has in quieter scenes.

There has always been a cinematic appeal to The Hunger Games, which is evident to any who have read Suzanne Collins’ best-selling novel, and this appeal is fully realized by director Gary Ross. At once harrowing and grand, the film is still grounded in the personal portrayal of Katniss Everdeen, played stunningly by Jennifer Lawrence. While the visuals and effects lack in places, holding the film back slightly, the nature of Suzanne Collins’ tale translates perhaps even stronger into cinema, and the grandiose nature of the film shines through in all the right moments.

Gary Ross has such a firm grasp of how the messages of the film affect us that The Hunger Games – the best sci-fi film in years – lives up to its potential. It is a cautionary tale with deep themes and messages wrapped in the most lowly entertainment imaginable: the Hunger Games.

Grade: A-

Rated: PG-13 (for intense violent thematic material and disturbing images – all involving teens.)

The Hunger Games opens nationwide March 23.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Joey-Mangum/1820064015 Joey Mangum

    Ensure*

  • http://twitter.com/SlySound Brett H

    Roger Ebert also posted his 3 star review of the movie. He made some thoughtful criticisms.  

    • Gary65

      He clearly hasn’t read the books and doesn’t get the point of the movie. I wouldn’t pay mush heed to his review.

      • http://www.facebook.com/louieschuth Louie Schuth

        He’s a film critic. Critiquing how close the movie is to the book isn’t his job, his job is to tell people whether or not to see the movie.

        • http://twitter.com/SlySound Brett H

          Exactly he’s critiquing the movie on its own merits outside of the context of the novel. However, he is right to an extent about the Districts enjoying the games (not all of them) even if he hasn’t read the novels. Career Districts anyone?

          • http://www.facebook.com/louieschuth Louie Schuth

            I also think that this movie probably plays the people in the districts as apathetic to the games to create an ever greater contrast to the uprising.

          • http://hypable.com/author/jeremy-baril/ Jeremy Baril

            Honestly – I tried not to pay attention to the book when reviewing it. At least not in the sense most people would think of…

          • Erin Holt

             I have not read the books. I saw the movie today. On the subject of enjoying the games, I saw the actual districts watching with a detached desensitized manner before the one scene that drove the unhappiness with the situation home (District 11).

            On the subject on young girls fighting young men, one has only to look at antiquated and even  recent history to see that it’s not unnatural for humanity at all. In Roman times, the entertainment fights weren’t fair. Sometimes they’d use some pretty loaded technology to “flood” the remaining victims for sport, just cause they wanted to see people drown to death. Lots of times the victims in the ring were young people, peasants, or slaves.

            Not just the gladiators but also helpless men,
            women and children of all ages who were sentenced to die in the Roman
            Executions at the Colosseum. It’s strange to see supposedly educated critics thinking violence of the sort unnatural. But I suppose we never assumed they were historians, or you know, had a basic understanding of human history of violence. I don’t delude myself that we’ve risen above it.

            Sometimes, we don’t care about fair at all, just gore, sport, and entertainment. Some men get off on violence to young women. Is it fair? No. Done? Yes. We live in an exceptionally violent world. When you look at the children (in the movie) from the perspective of them being sacrifices….well. Even in the Bible sacrifices are generally young. Meso-American cultues also practiced child sacrifice.

            People want to think it’s unrealistic and a “stretch.” Those I suppose are the people who live a *charmed* life. The ones who have forgotten how violent our history is.

        • Gary65

          My point is that he doesn’t get the movie or the novel. He’s talking about how no one in Panel discusses the fairness of 12 year old girls fighting 18 year old men and how that is not realistic. He doesn’t get it.

          • http://twitter.com/SlySound Brett H

            He’s working in the confines of what the movie gives him. He has no background information from the novels. A lot of people are going to see this movie and not read the books. That’s who he was writing for. You don’t get it.

          • Gary65

            You just basically said my point in more words.

          • Tiana

            To that movie critic: If you are going to critique a movie, atleast get to know what it is about! Like maybe reading the sypnosis. . . Thats common sense!

          • Liderc

            Exactly, Brett H “gets it.”

            The majority of people who see the film this weekend won’t have read the book, just being honest.  It’s like the Potter films, the majority of viewers had never read any of the books, they had to work on the level that anyone could understand.  

        • http://hypable.com/author/jeremy-baril/ Jeremy Baril

          I would say that’s my job as well…

          • http://www.facebook.com/louieschuth Louie Schuth

            And you do a marvelous job at it. If I’ve ever said anything that you’ve taken as a slight to you it was completely unintended.

          • http://hypable.com/author/jeremy-baril/ Jeremy Baril

            That wasn’t my meaning, no. I think the “dot-dot-dot” I added makes it read wrong. I’m just pointing out that was how I approached the review as well, I wasn’t implying you thought otherwise. :)

    • Igora

       It was interesting reading Ebert’s review, because it obviously came from the perspective of the someone who as not read the book. For example, he is under the impression that the districts enjoy the Games in a way, because they do not fight back about them. To me, this may mean that the Capitol’s crushing power over the districts won’t be apparent to viewers that haven’t read the book. Regardless, very interesting to read a thoughtful review by someone unfamiliar with the story.

      • Jonah

        There’s a riot in the movie in District 11. How is it not apparent?

        • Anna-FilmGirl

          Spoiler warning please! :-(

    • http://www.eigakanthemovietheater.blogspot.com Jenny Leigh

      I don’t usually listen to him, but I do know that he’s tough so 3 stars is good from him IMO

  • Sarah

    I’m so happy with this review. Because of the nature of the hunger games (i.e. the televised entertainment aspect of the games), I believe the story would actually be better told by film. I have such high hopes for this movie, now more so than ever! 

  • http://twitter.com/elisabellido Elisa Bellido

    Can’t wait to see it!!! 

    • Effie Trinket

      No one can :)

  • Alexv1115

    ah, This is a Hunger games article I’m willing to be on board with. 

    thanks for the palate cleanser. 

  • Rohit

    *** The Rotten Tomatoes Rating just fell to 97% ***

    • http://twitter.com/acjub CK

      94…

      • Rohit

        It’s weird. On the main page the rating is now 94%. And when you click the link …. 95%. 10 minutes ago it was 97%…

        • Rohit

          But the first negative reviewer doesn’t know how to spell “Katniss”. So his review is invalid.

          • B.

             I saw that review. He seems to hate it, but with few solid reasons why.

          • http://www.eigakanthemovietheater.blogspot.com Jenny Leigh

            hahahahahhahaaa. I agree. Learn how to use IMDB before I trust your judgement. 

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Maria-Wang/542480760 Maria Wang

      93 now. There are some valid critiques, but one of them is just awful.

      • jordan.d

        Now its 91%

        • Eoin

          90%…

          • Liderc

            As the real ratings start to roll in =P

            John Carter stayed at 100% for a week before it dropped to 51%.  We’ll see how THG stands up to the crowds.

            People also have to remember that a “fresh” rating is also just 6/10 rating from the top critics.  The rest of us only get to rate out of /4.  

          • http://hypable.com/author/jeremy-baril/ Jeremy Baril

            “normal viewers’” reviews don’t contribute to the Rotten Tomatoes rating…

          • Liderc

            Won’t let me reply to you Jeremy.  I know normal viewers don’t count, I’m talking about the critics who don’t get early access to the movie.  Hence the changes we see from before movies are released to after they’re released.  

  • http://twitter.com/WhatTheGrace Grace Nzita

    I watched The Hunger Games yesterday at a screening that i was very lucky to attend, i’m not going to reveal any spoilers but what i can say for sure is that the acting from every single person, above everything else in the film was absolutely spot on. The ones that i didn’t expect too much of, were actually surprisingly really good!  

    I can’t wait for it to come out so that we can discuss it more!!But i’m definitely going to see it again on Friday :DD

  • http://twitter.com/Andrew_ww Andrew W

    :O. a positive review on a popular movie. It must be good.

  • http://twitter.com/Andrew_ww Andrew W

    They should release and unrated version on bluray

    • http://hypable.com/author/jeremy-baril/ Jeremy Baril

      The problem is they didn’t cut any violence from the movie because they filmed it for a PG-13 rating…Good idea otherwise.

      • http://www.eigakanthemovietheater.blogspot.com Jenny Leigh

        I feel like in the books (and currently I’m half way through rereading The Hunger Games again :D), that most of the violence in implied, not really seen. Though of course as readers, we see it, but in a movie we cannot see implied violence. Am I making sense?? I suppose we could see it, but if we’re to stay with Katniss, I say not.

        Not to say there’s no violence, but I always saw it as Young Adult/PG-13.

        • Daughter of Eve

          I get what you mean about the violence being implied, but I think that has to do with the narration, not what the characters see or experience. 

          For example, and taking only Hunger Games as an example, their entire life the characters are viewing hunger games and Katniss says so herself, watching them kill each and often times brutally.

          Katniss herself witnesses murders in the arena: the kid speared as he reaches for the bagpack,the grotesque way Glimmer dies because of the tracker jackers,Thresh smashing Clove’s face, the mutts tearing apart Cato while Katniss and Peeta can do nothing but hear his piteous cries, etc.

          So I see what you mean, but I think it’s more of the one-two word description more than anything that makes it seem implied.

          • http://www.eigakanthemovietheater.blogspot.com Jenny Leigh

            I suppose what I was trying to say in general is that the violence of the books just isn’t rated R violence. It’s sci-fi/fantasy violence, which always gets PG-13.
            Though I get what you mean as well!

          • CliveRogan

            The books violence is R rated though, even the sci-fi stuff.  Every cut produces a large amount of bleeding, Peeta’s infection isn’t exactly PG-13 friendly.  And I can’t think of many PG-13′s that show a twelve year old child being impaled with a spear (even this film didn’t actually show it).  So yeah, a lot of the books violence is only implied, or off page, but a lot of what’s there is R rated stuff.

        • Sara C.

          I think, when reading, the brain creates pictures the brain can handle…so my experience, as an adult, reading the book was probably very different than the experiece of my 11 year old daughter.  The words were the same, but the imagery I had was likely different than what HER mind created. 

          • http://www.eigakanthemovietheater.blogspot.com Jenny Leigh

            I agree with this statement very much. Which is why when there’s a film adaptation, that’s why fans freak out. It’s because (possibly) they feel like their image was ruined.

  • RussellTurner

    I can’t wait till Thursday night to see it in IMAX

    • http://hypable.com/author/jeremy-baril/ Jeremy Baril

      I’ll be going again just to see it the IMAX, as well.

  • Dally

    Only 22 hours left and I’ll be sitting down to watch. Tomorrow can’t come quick enough!

  • Charleston_chew

    hunger games is gay

    • Guest

      Obvious troll is obvious

  • http://twitter.com/Lorentio16 Lauren Dipple

    cannot contain excitement! as a film fanatic as well though i’m glad to see the transition to screen has been handled deftly:D

  • Bernardotriana

    Anything negatif???

    • http://hypable.com/author/jeremy-baril/ Jeremy Baril

      Did you read the review? I included everything that was negative.

  • goldensnidget

    I’ve been trying so hard not to freak out the way I did before Harry Potter came out, because the excitement was so all-consuming that it was exhausting… but after this review, Friday cannot come soon enough!!

  • Johanna

    this is too good to be true!

  • Jen

    Jeremy – I know you praised Jennifer Lawrence countless times on her acting, but what did you think of Josh Hutcherson as Peeta and Liam Hemsworth as Gale?

    • http://hypable.com/author/jeremy-baril/ Jeremy Baril

      Gale wasn’t really that much of a main-character, Peeta was good but not spectacular. Again, given less to do than Katniss.

  • Dreamer

    Arg! I’m so excited to see the Hunger Games, I’m dying here!

  • kate

    22hrs and 10 mintues til i see it!!!! (3:45pm) so excited

  • Mad

    I just saw the movie at a premiere I was invited to. It was incredible, the best film I’ve ever seen. It included so much of the book, and what wasn’t is understandable, because you have to adapt the book to a film. Btw, one of the characters is actually better in the movie!

  • LadyGaga11397

    OMGOODNESS… I cant wait til i go see it

  • http://www.facebook.com/shavindrasharma Shavindra Sharma

    I absolutely loved this movie, and this review is absolutely right!!

    Everyone has to watch it, people who have not read the books will love it, people who have read the books (may complain about certain things) but will learn to love it… I personally want to see it again!! :D

  • Redandy (Belgium)

    I just saw the movie. It was awesome. Just like the books. the added scenes were gave an added value to the movie. Jennifer was superb, Josh was veru good. A shame that we didn’t see a lot of Liam but we saw more of him in the movie than that we read about Gale in the book. one of the best book adaptations I have ever seen.

  • Mad

    It was the most incredibly beautiful, powerfully moving, sadly haunting, yet amazingly hilarious movie you will probably ever see! Probably the most faithful book to film adaptation ever!

  • http://twitter.com/KatieISperalda Katie Speralda

    The film won’t be released in my country till the 30th! I just can’t wait for this :)
    Oh and it’s 

  • http://twitter.com/hunyumstan Hunyum Murya

    whatever I expected of this movie, I sure as hell got it. 
    One of the very few films whose movie adaptation is equally satisfying as the book. It has completely lived up to it’s hype.

    And Jennifer is just amazing to watch. Such a relief to see the movie turn out so well.
    The others were superb too, but Jenn, Woody & Elizabeth were the highlight of the movie for me.

  • http://about.me/dshana Shana Debusschere

    I saw it today and I’m still shocked by how good it was. But I’m wondering wether or not I saw the unrated (American) or rated (British version), since I saw it in Belgium, and I don’t think a statement has been made about that.. 

  • Celeste L.

    Just saw it and absolutely loved it.  I’m so very often disappointed when Hollywood gets hold of a well written book, but here they have set it on fire.  Thank you, Suzanne Collins for a wonderful book and thank you Lionsgate for not making it into entirely different than what it started out as a great story.  You did yourselves proud.

  • Ilovethehungergames

    Best movie ever. Loved it, favorite movie.

  • Spaceballs rules

    One of the best movies I have ever seen! Saw it the day it came out. Rating=A

  • Pbjcrazed

    hey andrew and company:) (i really don’t know how to spell all your names) i just wanted to say something about the movie. i watched it at this run down theater and HATED IT! iwas soo surprised how back the special effects were.. the only thing i really liked was the acting, which was soo spectacular! but today i saw the movie again at a really nice theater, and i LOVE it! i think it stayed really ture to the book and was surprised at how amazing the camera shots were. the acting was as great and perfect as ever, except gale, and i loved the added scenes with the gamemakers. thanks for your consideration your all my favorite, pickles kayce (girl):)

  • http://twitter.com/HungerGames4all Rae

    Ok…WOW! After watching this twice already (IMAX first, then UltraAVX) I agree with everything you said, Jeremy! Nailed this review! While this movie wasn’t flawless (although Jennifer was), it is one the BEST adapted movies perhaps EVER! So thanks Jeremy for pointing out all the things while not giving out too much spoilers!

  • http://twitter.com/amallalla Anne Marie

    Its funny cause I thought of this movie as an A- as well, but due to different reasons. I have read the books, and I felt the movie lack a certain depth to the relationships represented in the movie. Of course, this is as expected since the book most always will give a better insight into relationships. I also felt the movie missed some key elements of the relationships with Haymitch. I had to explain to my friend, who hasn’t read to book, why Peeta didn’t want to train with Katniss and so on. But with that as the only drawback, I felt this movie really really lived up to my expectations, and hope that the next movies will as well

  • Mrs_Badcrumble

    Now that I’ve seen the movie, I totally agree. They were able to create a great movie, that works for itself but is true to the source material. Nevertheless they were able to add and edit the story to a new medium, without losing it’s heart. And that is really difficult in well loved adaptations.

  • little5

    As a big Hunger Games fan I just wanted to say that I love the books, but was very disappointed by the movie. I was not impressed with the dialog. In fact, at one point in the movie I actually stated laughing because it was so cheesy! I would have liked to hear some of the lines from the book rather than the screen writers interpretation.(The book had some funny lines!) I really wish they would have portrayed Haymitch as a drunk and not just a jerk. (In the whole movie I think he had one drink!) Also would have liked to see his little nose dive into the crowd! I know that there is a time limit, but how can they cut out the good stuff??? I do think that Jennifer Lawrence did an amazing acting job! Looking forward to the future films and am hoping they stay true to the books, (because I think they omitted a few little things that could be important later) although a little back tracking may be in order…the Prep Team? Peeta’s leg? All in all I’ll watch the next one, but am hoping they can pull it together.

    • Logan

      Well you’ve gotta understand that the movie wasn’t meant to be funny though. Some things in books that are funny just don’t feel right when you put them in films. Example, Haymitch falling off the stage during reaping? No way, the movie would become a comedy, and that’s not what it’s supposed to be.
      Peeta’s leg wasn’t something that was important anyway. Because really, how much did it affect him in the next two books? It probably wasn’t even mentioned again. I do agree that some lines were a little cheesy though. But Jennifer Lawrence can pull off any line really, she is amazing.
      However I am not at all disappointed with the film.. I really think you should watch it a second time. That’s when you actually stop comparing the film to the books and actually enjoy it as a movie, just like what a previous article said. I loved it the second time more than the first. Films and books are really different things, so some things cannot be portrayed the same way.. It wouldn’t seem right.

  • Carl From Hawaii

    I love it and Cant wait to here your reveiw on Hunger game chat 

  • http://twitter.com/G30rg13_R Georgie R

    Good rating – I agree with the A- but out of 10 would give it 8 or 9/10 because I liked it but it left out a few bits I would have liked. It’s a definate must-see for fans of the books though! :)

  • TuesdayNext

    I watched The Hunger Games first, before I read the books. I wanted to see what it was like to go the other way around. I thought it was a nice movie, but I don’t like the hype around the books or movie. Yes, it shows great themes , I’ll give Collins that, but I was scared. Her book read like a teenage version of 1984, where she changed the language, grey imagery etc. What I am saying is why are people so eager to watch the movies? Why do we want to watch those children die or the violence in it? Why is there an obsession about it? It’s ironic how the movie and books illustrate how bizarre the games are, yet we are in the cinema watching it.
    I read all the books now , so that I could give a well backed opinion about them.
    If you want dystopia read 1984 or better yet, read The Handmaids Tale by Margret Atwood.

Hypable encourages the community to use our Comments feature to hold thoughtful, polite, and critical discussions. We do NOT tolerate inappropriate, rude, or downright mean discussion towards the news story's subject matter or towards other Hypable users. We reserve the right to delete or ban comments and users who violate these guidelines.

More in Features, Movies, Review, The Hunger Games (4093 of 7602 articles)
woody_allen