• Like Us On Facebook
    • Like us on Facebook

  • +1 Us on Google
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Facebook
    • Follow us on tumblr.

  • Search

As we reported yesterday when the news broke, the actor that has been hired to voice a very important character in The Hobbit‘s mythos has given away what would prove to be a massive change from The Hobbit‘s ink and paper twin. Empire magazine has now released a quick analysis about why this might not be the end of the world.

In an interview with Empire (via CBM), Benedict Cumberbatch, the actor behind the voice of The Necromancer (more commonly referred to as Sauron) let slip that Lord of the Rings antagonist will be making an appearance in the Battle of the Five Armies. From the interview:

” I’m playing Smaug through motion-capture and voicing the Necromancer, which is a character in the Five Legions War or something which I’m meant to understand. He’s not actually in the original Hobbit. It’s something [Peter Jackson]’s taken from Lord Of The Rings that he wants to put in there.”

Aside from getting the name of the war wrong (it’s probably safe to assume that he meant the Battle of the Five Armies and not an entirely new battle written by Jackson), he also doesn’t seem to realize that the Necromancer is also known as Sauron. Although it is possible that he is simply getting his facts wrong, Tolkien and Jackson fans alike should be used to massive changes in the story by this point.

In The Hobbit, Gandalf disappears halfway through the book to lead a coalition against the Necromancer to banish him from his Mirkwood stronghold. In the book, this happens long before the Battle of the Five Armies, but it seems that we might see Sauron turn up for the battle in second half of The Hobbit

Empire Magazine is quick to point out how this might work in the favor of the narrative:

Here, however, it looks like he’s going to turn up to the finale in person, presumably at the head of the goblin and Warg army, and face Gandalf’s team there.

If that is the case, it’s a narratively neat way to combine the two story threads, that of Bilbo and the dwarves and the other following Gandalf and his team. It also gives the goblins a stronger motivation to suddenly turn up: in the book, they’re avenging the earlier death of one of their leaders and (like all the other armies present) hoping to get their grubby hands on the dragon’s hoard. If they’re incited or led by Sauron, however, their actions will hang more coherently with their behaviour later in Lord Of The Rings.

So what do you think? Will the change work in favor of the overall arc of the films, or should Jackson remain faithful to Tolkien’s work?

Should Sauron show up at the Battle of the Five Armies?

Loading ... Loading ...
  • moonshoespotter1712

    peter jackson can do anything he likes :)

  • http://twitter.com/_TARDIStravels i will have orderϟ

    I think this is a GREAT idea! This will make the Battle of the Five Armies much more…interesting in my opinion. I always did want the entire “Necromancer” story line to go more in depth, and hopefully Jackson will do just that:) The Lord of the Rings had different changes than the books, and yet they won 11 Oscars…I cannot wait!

    • HPF93

      I very much agree:)

  • HPF93

    Well I could see this going two ways. One; i’m sure there are people out there who think that this could just totally wrong and that PJ should stick to the book. I can agree with those people and say to keep it they way it is writen. Keeping things they started can always be a good thing. And two; I very much agree with i will have order’s comment below mine. This could make the Battle of the Five Armies much more interesting. And besides, everybody knows how movie people can be sometimes. Though I wouldn’t place PJ there. He’ll know whats best for the movie in the end.

  • Guest

    I never saw the Necromancer as Sauron himself, but a puppet as Saruman was, because wasn’t Sauron destroyed by Isildur hundreds of years earlier?

    • stargazer

      Sauron wasn’t “destroyed,” but his physical form was.  Gandalf goes to figure out who/what the Necromancer he’s been hearing about is, and it turns out that the Necromancer is Sauron (I’m pretty sure I’m getting this right.  Somebody correct me if I’m wrong–I haven’t read The Hobbit or The Lord of the Rings for a long time, and I have to admit I never read the appendicies, where most of this information is).  The White Council kicks the Necromancer out of Mirkwood, and he flees south to Mordor, where he begins to build power once again, and this is where he’s revealed to be Sauron (apparently he didn’t have a body as the Necromancer, as he’s only built up to a Great Eye when Frodo comes along).

  • Catherine

    I guess I’m a book purist because I think this is a bad idea.

    Also, “ink and paper twin”?  I think you copied that from the Half-Blood Prince dedication.

  • Yapping

    i suppose it makes sense if jackson does feel the need to tie the lord of the rings to the hobbit, but- why? why does he have to? aren’t the links in the story enough? the hobbit isn’t and wasn’t designed to be a direct prequel to the lord of the rings… but jackson has always been right in the past, and i believe it will work brilliantl from a movie perspective, even if i feel it’s unnecessary…

Hypable encourages the community to use our Comments feature to hold thoughtful, polite, and critical discussions. We do NOT tolerate inappropriate, rude, or downright mean discussion towards the news story's subject matter or towards other Hypable users. We reserve the right to delete or ban comments and users who violate these guidelines.